Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Documentary Project Reflection

To be honest, this post is going to be pretty boring. If you are faint of heart, leave now and watch my documentary below.





     My documentary, called “Passing the Test” is a short documentary on the educational system in the United States, and what the President of the United States should do to improve it. I worked with Max Scribner and Sam Howells on the project. We submitted the documentary to the C-SPAN Student Cam documentary competition, and won an Honorable Mention. In the competition, there were over 1,800 entries, with 75 winners.
     I found the topic of education very interesting. We had a section of our documentary dedicated to the impact of standardized testing, which I found particularly interesting. I am currently continuing to research this topic and how it affects teacher evaluations in the state of Maryland for my feature story for Journalism. At the very beginning of the project, I enjoyed that we were able to pick our topics and form our own groups. I think that letting students pick their own topics is good because that way the student will be genuinely interested in the topic, will produce better work than if they didn't enjoy the topic, and are less likely to regret picking that topic.
     As I said above, learning about the entire topic of education in the United States was very interesting to me, especially about standardized testing. One specific thing I came to realize during the filmmaking process was that standardized tests really don't exist in the real world. The skills that are valuable are being able to produce a product, be able to answer other's questions and communicate effectively; not filling out bubbles on a scantron.
     Throughout the process of making the documentary, we had a few problems. One was that about halfway through the project, our group lost the drive to finish the project because the deadline seemed so close. That week was also the week of midterm exams, which compounded the stress put on our group. To get past this problem, I tried to lead our group by putting in extra time to pick up what others were putting off. Another problem that our group faced was that when we went to edit, we planned on using a brand new computer I had built the week before. The computer ended up having some problems with displaying graphics, but by staying up till 2 in the morning 3 days in a row to fix the problems, I got the computer running and caught up on editing, which put us back on track.
     There were many things in my project that I would like to change if I could do it again. I would probably do the project by myself next time, because there is really no need for more than one person, unlike other projects in which you need actors, cameramen, and directors. Additionally, I would have liked to shoot the video with a nicer camera. But we had a pretty sweet one to begin with. (Problems of being a camera addict).
     I think that our teacher, Mr. Mayo, did a fine job guiding us through the documentary. It was nice because he wasn't that involved, which let us create what we wanted. Also, as I said before, because we got to pick our own topics, we were all invested in our project, and really needed no outside motivation to do our projects.
In conclusion, I think our project went great, and I don't think that much should be changed about the assignment, except for that we should be given a little more time at the very beginning of the project to more thoroughly research a few topics before deciding on one final one.


"This post is too boring for a poem"

-Zephyr

No comments:

Post a Comment